Atom D2700 vs Celeron N2807

Place in the ranking	3108	3128
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Intel Celeron	Intel Atom
Power efficiency	7.33	2.74
Architecture codename	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)	Cedarview (2011−2012)
Release date	23 February 2014 (10 years ago)	1 November 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$107	$52

Detailed specifications

Celeron N2807 and Atom D2700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	2	4
Base clock speed	1.58 GHz	2.13 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.16 GHz	0.13 GHz
L1 cache	56K (per core)	64 KB (per core)
L2 cache	512K (per core)	512K (per core)
L3 cache	0 KB	0 KB
Chip lithography	22 nm	32 nm
Die size	no data	66 mm²
Maximum core temperature	105 °C	100 °C
Number of transistors	no data	176 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2807 and Atom D2700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	FCBGA1170	FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)	4.3 Watt	10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2807 and Atom D2700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	-
Turbo Boost Technology	-	-
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	+
Idle States	+	no data
Demand Based Switching	no data	-
PAE	no data	36 Bit
Smart Connect	+	no data
AMT	no data	-
HD Audio	no data	+
RST	-	no data

Security technologies

Celeron N2807 and Atom D2700 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB	+	+
Secure Key	+	no data
Anti-Theft	-	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2807 and Atom D2700 are enumerated here.

VT-d	-	-
VT-x	+	-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2807 and Atom D2700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR3
Maximum memory size	4 GB	4 GB
Max memory channels	1	1
Maximum memory bandwidth	no data	6.4 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card Compare	Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series	Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 (640 MHz)
Quick Sync Video	+	-
Graphics max frequency	750 MHz	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2807 and Atom D2700 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2807 and Atom D2700.

PCIe version	2.0	no data
PCI Express lanes	4	4
USB revision	3.0 and 2.0	no data
Total number of SATA ports	2	2
Number of USB ports	5	8

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N2807 0.31
+6.9%

Atom D2700 0.29

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N2807 486
+6.6%

Atom D2700 456

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron N2807 152
+34.5%

Atom D2700 113

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron N2807 254

Atom D2700 318
+25.2%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Celeron N2807 1

Atom D2700 1
+33.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.31	0.29
Recency	23 February 2014	1 November 2011
Threads	2	4
Chip lithography	22 nm	32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	4 Watt	10 Watt

Celeron N2807 has a 6.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

Atom D2700, on the other hand, has 100% more threads.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Celeron N2807 and Atom D2700.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2807 and Atom D2700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.