i3-9100F vs Celeron N2805

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N2805 and Core i3-9100F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1366
Place by popularitynot in top-10040
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data9.99
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Core i3
Power efficiencyno data6.17
Architecture codenameBay Trail-M (2013−2014)Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)
Release date11 September 2013 (11 years ago)23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$122

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N2805 and Core i3-9100F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed1.46 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.46 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data36
L1 cache56K (per core)256 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache0 KB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data126 mm2
Maximum core temperature80 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2805 and Core i3-9100F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1170FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)4.3 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2805 and Core i3-9100F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Connect+no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N2805 and Core i3-9100F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2805 and Core i3-9100F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2805 and Core i3-9100F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size4 GB64 GB
Max memory channels12
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series-
Clear Video HD--
Graphics max frequency667 MHz-
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2805 and Core i3-9100F integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2805 and Core i3-9100F.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes416
USB revision3.0 and 2.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N2805 335
i3-9100F 6735
+1910%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Celeron N2805 756
i3-9100F 6509
+761%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Celeron N2805 1430
i3-9100F 18118
+1167%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Celeron N2805 85.2
i3-9100F 11.81
+621%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Celeron N2805 44
i3-9100F 634
+1341%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Celeron N2805 24
i3-9100F 171
+613%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Celeron N2805 0.1
i3-9100F 3
+3650%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Celeron N2805 3
i3-9100F 44
+1317%

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Celeron N2805 17
i3-9100F 218
+1156%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Celeron N2805 887
i3-9100F 4052
+357%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 September 2013 23 April 2019
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 65 Watt

Celeron N2805 has 1525% lower power consumption.

i3-9100F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron N2805 and Core i3-9100F. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron N2805 is a notebook processor while Core i3-9100F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2805 and Core i3-9100F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N2805
Celeron N2805
Intel Core i3-9100F
Core i3-9100F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 98 votes

Rate Celeron N2805 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 6965 votes

Rate Core i3-9100F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N2805 or Core i3-9100F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.