Celeron Dual-Core T3300 vs Atom N2650
Primary details
Comparing Atom N2650 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Atom | Intel Celeron Dual-Core |
| Architecture codename | Cedarview-M (2011−2012) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| Release date | 5 January 2012 (12 years ago) | 1 February 2010 (14 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Atom N2650 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.73 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Atom N2650 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | no data | Socket P 478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3,6 Watt | 35 Watt |
Security technologies
Atom N2650 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | no data | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 5 January 2012 | 1 February 2010 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 35 Watt |
Atom N2650 has an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more threads, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 1066.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Atom N2650 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N2650 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
