i3-9100F vs Celeron N2830

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N2830
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 7 Watt
0.34
Core i3-9100F
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.24
+1147%

Core i3-9100F outperforms Celeron N2830 by a whopping 1147% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N2830 and Core i3-9100F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30701384
Place by popularitynot in top-10037
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data10.26
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Core i3
Power efficiency4.606.17
Architecture codenameBay Trail-M (2013−2014)Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)
Release date23 February 2014 (10 years ago)23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$122

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N2830 and Core i3-9100F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.16 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.41 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data36
L1 cache56K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data126 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2830 and Core i3-9100F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1170FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)7.5 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2830 and Core i3-9100F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Connect+no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N2830 and Core i3-9100F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2830 and Core i3-9100F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2830 and Core i3-9100F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size8 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series-
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD--
Graphics max frequency750 MHz-
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2830 and Core i3-9100F integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2830 and Core i3-9100F.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes416
USB revision3.0 and 2.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N2830 0.34
i3-9100F 4.24
+1147%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N2830 548
i3-9100F 6735
+1129%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron N2830 164
i3-9100F 1398
+752%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron N2830 277
i3-9100F 3736
+1249%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Celeron N2830 1185
i3-9100F 6509
+450%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Celeron N2830 2240
i3-9100F 18118
+709%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Celeron N2830 1
i3-9100F 5
+556%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Celeron N2830 67
i3-9100F 634
+846%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Celeron N2830 38
i3-9100F 171
+350%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Celeron N2830 0.43
i3-9100F 1.95
+353%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.34 4.24
Recency 23 February 2014 23 April 2019
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 65 Watt

Celeron N2830 has 828.6% lower power consumption.

i3-9100F, on the other hand, has a 1147.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i3-9100F is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N2830 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron N2830 is a notebook processor while Core i3-9100F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2830 and Core i3-9100F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N2830
Celeron N2830
Intel Core i3-9100F
Core i3-9100F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 240 votes

Rate Celeron N2830 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 7063 votes

Rate Core i3-9100F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N2830 or Core i3-9100F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.