Pentium 4 HT EE 3.20 vs Celeron M U3600
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M U3600 and Pentium 4 HT EE 3.20 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | no data |
| Architecture codename | Arrandale (2010−2011) | Gallatin (2003−2004) |
| Release date | 18 December 2010 (13 years ago) | November 2003 (20 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M U3600 and Pentium 4 HT EE 3.20 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 2500 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 8 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | 81+114 mm2 | 237 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 382+177 Million | 178 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M U3600 and Pentium 4 HT EE 3.20 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | BGA1288 | 478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 110 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M U3600 and Pentium 4 HT EE 3.20. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Flex Memory Access | + | no data |
| Fast Memory Access | + | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron M U3600 and Pentium 4 HT EE 3.20 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M U3600 and Pentium 4 HT EE 3.20 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M U3600 and Pentium 4 HT EE 3.20. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 110 Watt |
Celeron M U3600 has 100% more physical cores, a 306.3% more advanced lithography process, and 511.1% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron M U3600 and Pentium 4 HT EE 3.20. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron M U3600 is a notebook processor while Pentium 4 HT EE 3.20 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M U3600 and Pentium 4 HT EE 3.20, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
