Ultra 7 268V vs Celeron M P4600

Aggregate performance score

Celeron M P4600
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.58
Core Ultra 7 268V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 17 Watt
15.65
+2598%

Core Ultra 7 268V outperforms Celeron M P4600 by a whopping 2598% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M P4600 and Core Ultra 7 268V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2819459
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron Mno data
Power efficiency1.5183.94
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date1 October 2010 (14 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron M P4600 and Core Ultra 7 268V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speedno data2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz5 GHz
Bus rate2500 MHz37 MHz
L1 cache128 KB192 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm3 nm
Die size81+114 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Number of transistors382+177 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M P4600 and Core Ultra 7 268V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPGA988Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M P4600 and Core Ultra 7 268V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSX-+
Thermal Monitoring+-

Security technologies

Celeron M P4600 and Core Ultra 7 268V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M P4600 and Core Ultra 7 268V are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M P4600 and Core Ultra 7 268V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataArc 140V

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M P4600 and Core Ultra 7 268V.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.58 15.65
Recency 1 October 2010 24 September 2024
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 17 Watt

Ultra 7 268V has a 2598.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 966.7% more advanced lithography process, and 105.9% lower power consumption.

The Core Ultra 7 268V is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M P4600 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M P4600 and Core Ultra 7 268V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M P4600
Celeron M P4600
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
Core Ultra 7 268V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate Celeron M P4600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Core Ultra 7 268V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M P4600 or Core Ultra 7 268V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.