i9-10980XE vs Celeron M P4500

Aggregate performance score

Celeron M P4500
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.62
Core i9-10980XE
2019
18 cores / 36 threads, 165 Watt
20.64
+3229%

Core i9-10980XE outperforms Celeron M P4500 by a whopping 3229% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M P4500 and Core i9-10980XE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2777263
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data11.30
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeron Mno data
Power efficiency1.6811.84
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Cascade Lake-X (2019)
Release date1 April 2010 (14 years ago)19 October 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86$979

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron M P4500 and Core i9-10980XE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)18 (Octadeca-Core)
Threads236
Base clock speedno data3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.86 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rate2500 MHz8 GT/s DMI3 MHz
L1 cache128 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB24.75 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size81+114 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °C86 °C
Number of transistors382+177 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M P4500 and Core i9-10980XE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPGA988FCLGA2066
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt165 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M P4500 and Core i9-10980XE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron M P4500 and Core i9-10980XE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M P4500 and Core i9-10980XE are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M P4500 and Core i9-10980XE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data256 GB
Max memory channelsno data4
Maximum memory bandwidthno data94 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M P4500 and Core i9-10980XE.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data48

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron M P4500 0.62
i9-10980XE 20.64
+3229%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Celeron M P4500 2533
i9-10980XE 7847
+210%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Celeron M P4500 4826
i9-10980XE 59479
+1132%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Celeron M P4500 37.1
i9-10980XE 2.81
+1220%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Celeron M P4500 1
i9-10980XE 38
+3209%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.62 20.64
Recency 1 April 2010 19 October 2019
Physical cores 2 18
Threads 2 36
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 165 Watt

Celeron M P4500 has 371.4% lower power consumption.

i9-10980XE, on the other hand, has a 3229% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 800% more physical cores and 1700% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i9-10980XE is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M P4500 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron M P4500 is a notebook processor while Core i9-10980XE is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M P4500 and Core i9-10980XE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M P4500
Celeron M P4500
Intel Core i9-10980XE
Core i9-10980XE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 11 votes

Rate Celeron M P4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 567 votes

Rate Core i9-10980XE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M P4500 or Core i9-10980XE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.