Apple M1 Max vs Celeron M P4500
Aggregate performance score
Apple M1 Max outperforms Celeron M P4500 by a whopping 2126% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M P4500 and M1 Max processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2798 | 533 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | Apple M-Series |
| Power efficiency | 1.69 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Arrandale (2010−2011) | no data |
| Release date | 1 April 2010 (14 years ago) | 18 October 2021 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $86 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M P4500 and M1 Max basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 10 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.06 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.86 GHz | 3.22 GHz |
| Bus rate | 2500 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 2.9 MB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 28 MB |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 48 MB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 81+114 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 382+177 Million | 57000 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M P4500 and M1 Max compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | PGA988 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.62 | 13.80 |
| Recency | 1 April 2010 | 18 October 2021 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 10 |
| Threads | 2 | 10 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 5 nm |
Apple M1 Max has a 2125.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 400% more physical cores and 400% more threads, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.
The M1 Max is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M P4500 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M P4500 and Apple M1 Max, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
