Apple M1 Max vs Celeron M P4500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron M P4500
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.64

Apple M1 Max outperforms Celeron M P4500 by a whopping 1736% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M P4500 and Apple M1 Max processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2668621
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron MApple M-Series
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)no data
Release date1 April 2010 (14 years ago)18 October 2021 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86no data
Current priceno data$8.99

Detailed specifications

Celeron M P4500 and Apple M1 Max basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads210
Base clock speedno data2.06 GHz
Boost clock speed1.86 GHz3.22 GHz
Bus support2500 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB2.9 MB
L2 cache512 KB28 MB
L3 cache2 MB48 MB
Chip lithography32 nm5 nm
Die size81+114 mm2no data
Number of transistors382+177 Million57000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M P4500 and Apple M1 Max compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPGA988no data
Power consumption (TDP)35 Wattno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M1 Max 32-Core GPU

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.64 11.75
Recency 1 April 2010 18 October 2021
Physical cores 2 10
Threads 2 10
Chip lithography 32 nm 5 nm

The Apple M1 Max is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M P4500 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M P4500 and Apple M1 Max, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M P4500
Celeron M P4500
Apple M1 Max
M1 Max

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 11 votes

Rate Celeron M P4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 672 votes

Rate Apple M1 Max on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M P4500 or Apple M1 Max, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.