Athlon XP-M 3000+ vs Celeron M 722
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 722 and Athlon XP-M 3000+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | no data |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Barton (2001−2004) |
| Release date | 1 October 2008 (16 years ago) | January 2001 (24 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 722 and Athlon XP-M 3000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 101 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | 63 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 722 and Athlon XP-M 3000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | VGA956 | A |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5.5 Watt | 45 Watt |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 45 Watt |
Celeron M 722 has a 188.9% more advanced lithography process, and 800% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron M 722 and Athlon XP-M 3000+. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 722 and Athlon XP-M 3000+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
