Mobile Pentium III 500 vs Celeron M 530

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3395not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCeleron Mno data
Power efficiency0.64no data
DesignerIntelIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Coppermine (1999−2001)
Release dateno data25 October 1999 (25 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$530

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 530 and Mobile Pentium III 500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Base clock speed1.73 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.73 GHz0.5 GHz
Bus rate533 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data32 KB
L2 cacheno data256 KB
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography65 nm180 nm
Die sizeno data106 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data28 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range0.95V-1.3Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 530 and Mobile Pentium III 500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPBGA479,PPGA478495
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 530 and Mobile Pentium III 500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron M 530 and Mobile Pentium III 500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 530 and Mobile Pentium III 500 are enumerated here.

VT-x-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 65 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 17 Watt

Celeron M 530 has a 176.9% more advanced lithography process.

Mobile Pentium III 500, on the other hand, has 76.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron M 530 and Intel Mobile Pentium III 500. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 530
Celeron M 530
Intel Mobile Pentium III 500
Mobile Pentium III 500

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 41 votes

Rate Celeron M 530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 1 vote

Rate Mobile Pentium III 500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron M 530 and Mobile Pentium III 500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.