Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 vs Celeron M 575

Aggregate performance score

Celeron M 575
2008, $86
1 core / 1 thread, 31 Watt
0.23
+91.7%
Mobile Pentium 4 2.80
2003
1 core / 2 threads, 68 Watt
0.12

Celeron M 575 outperforms Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 by an impressive 92% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking34743659
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron Mno data
Power efficiency0.310.07
DesignerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Northwood (2002−2004)
Release date1 June 2008 (17 years ago)June 2003 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 575 and Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads12
Boost clock speed2 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus rate667 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data8 KB
L2 cache1 MB512 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm130 nm
Die size143 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data75 °C
Number of transistors291 Million55 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 575 and Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPPGA478478
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt68 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 575 and Mobile Pentium 4 2.80. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 575 and Mobile Pentium 4 2.80. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1, DDR2

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.23 0.12
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 65 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 68 Watt

Celeron M 575 has a 91.7% higher aggregate performance score, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 119.4% lower power consumption.

Mobile Pentium 4 2.80, on the other hand, has 100% more threads.

The Intel Celeron M 575 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 575
Celeron M 575
Intel Mobile Pentium 4 2.80
Mobile Pentium 4 2.80

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 11 votes

Rate Celeron M 575 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 8 votes

Rate Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron M 575 and Mobile Pentium 4 2.80, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.