Celeron M 530 vs M 560

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron M 560
2008
1 core / 1 thread, 30 Watt
0.34
+78.9%
Celeron M 530
1 core / 1 thread, 30 Watt
0.19

Celeron M 560 outperforms Celeron M 530 by an impressive 79% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 560 and Celeron M 530 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30783249
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron MCeleron M
Power efficiency1.070.60
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Merom (2006−2008)
Release date1 May 2008 (16 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 560 and Celeron M 530 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Base clock speedno data1.73 GHz
Boost clock speed2.13 GHz1.73 GHz
Bus rate533 MHz533 MHz
L1 cache64 KBno data
L2 cache1 MBno data
L3 cacheno data1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography65 nm65 nm
Die size143 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistors291 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.95V-1.3V

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 560 and Celeron M 530 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPPGA478PBGA479,PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt30 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 560 and Celeron M 530. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Celeron M 560 and Celeron M 530 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 560 and Celeron M 530 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron M 560 0.34
+78.9%
Celeron M 530 0.19

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron M 560 535
+77.2%
Celeron M 530 302

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Celeron M 560 2008
+24.3%
Celeron M 530 1615

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.34 0.19

Celeron M 560 has a 78.9% higher aggregate performance score.

The Celeron M 560 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 530 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 560 and Celeron M 530, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 560
Celeron M 560
Intel Celeron M 530
Celeron M 530

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 43 votes

Rate Celeron M 560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 40 votes

Rate Celeron M 530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 560 or Celeron M 530, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.