VIA Nano L2100 vs Celeron M 550

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 550 and VIA Nano L2100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCeleron MNano
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Isaiah (2009)
Release dateno datano data
Current price$294 no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 550 and VIA Nano L2100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed2 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus support533 MHz800 MHz
Chip lithography65 nm65 nm
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 550 and VIA Nano L2100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt25 Watt

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron M 550 465
+66.7%
VIA Nano L2100 279

Celeron M 550 outperforms VIA Nano L2100 by 67% in Passmark.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Celeron M 550 877
+49.9%
VIA Nano L2100 585

Celeron M 550 outperforms VIA Nano L2100 by 50% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Pros & cons summary


Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 25 Watt

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 550 and VIA Nano L2100. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 550 and VIA Nano L2100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 550
Celeron M 550
VIA Nano L2100
Nano L2100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 27 votes

Rate Celeron M 550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 8 votes

Rate VIA Nano L2100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 550 or VIA Nano L2100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.