Xeon Platinum 8461V vs Celeron M 540
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 540 and Xeon Platinum 8461V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | 41 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 24.07 |
Market segment | Laptop | Server |
Series | Celeron M | no data |
Power efficiency | no data | 14.89 |
Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
Release date | 1 October 2007 (17 years ago) | 10 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $4,491 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 540 and Xeon Platinum 8461V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 48 (Octatetraconta-Core) |
Threads | 1 | 96 |
Base clock speed | no data | 2.2 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 1.86 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
Bus rate | 533 MHz | no data |
L1 cache | no data | 80K (per core) |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | no data | 97.5 MB |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | Intel 7 nm |
Die size | no data | 4x 477 mm2 |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 77 °C |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 540 and Xeon Platinum 8461V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | no data | FCLGA4677 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 300 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 540 and Xeon Platinum 8461V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
AES-NI | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
vPro | no data | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Speed Shift | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
TSX | - | + |
Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Celeron M 540 and Xeon Platinum 8461V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
EDB | no data | + |
SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 540 and Xeon Platinum 8461V are enumerated here.
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 540 and Xeon Platinum 8461V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | no data | DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 4 TB |
Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 540 and Xeon Platinum 8461V.
PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 80 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 1 October 2007 | 10 January 2023 |
Physical cores | 1 | 48 |
Threads | 1 | 96 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 300 Watt |
Celeron M 540 has 900% lower power consumption.
Xeon Platinum 8461V, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 15 years, and 4700% more physical cores and 9500% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Celeron M 540 and Xeon Platinum 8461V. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron M 540 is a notebook processor while Xeon Platinum 8461V is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 540 and Xeon Platinum 8461V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.