VIA C7-M C7-M-1200 vs Celeron M 540
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 540 and VIA C7-M C7-M-1200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Celeron M | C7-M |
| Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Esther |
| Release date | 1 October 2007 (16 years ago) | no data |
| Current price | $29 | $244 |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 540 and VIA C7-M C7-M-1200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.86 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| Bus support | 533 MHz | 400 MHz |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 540 and VIA C7-M C7-M-1200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 5 Watt |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Benchmark coverage: 20%
Celeron M 540 outperforms VIA C7-M C7-M-1200 by 442% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Celeron M 540 outperforms VIA C7-M C7-M-1200 by 293% in 3DMark06 CPU.
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 5 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Celeron M 540 and VIA C7-M C7-M-1200. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 540 and VIA C7-M C7-M-1200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
