Turion II M540 vs Celeron M 540
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 540 and Turion II M540 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3073 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Celeron M | AMD Turion II |
| Power efficiency | 1.07 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Caspian (2009) |
| Release date | 1 October 2007 (17 years ago) | 10 September 2009 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 540 and Turion II M540 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.86 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Bus rate | 533 MHz | 3600 MHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 540 and Turion II M540 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | no data | Socket S1 (s1g3) 638-pin |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 540 and Turion II M540. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization |
| PowerNow | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 October 2007 | 10 September 2009 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 35 Watt |
Celeron M 540 has 16.7% lower power consumption.
Turion II M540, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron M 540 and Turion II M540. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 540 and Turion II M540, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
