Xeon Silver 4314 vs Celeron M 530

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 530 and Xeon Silver 4314 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated315
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesCeleron Mno data
Power efficiencyno data12.78
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release dateno data6 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 530 and Xeon Silver 4314 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads132
Base clock speed1.73 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed1.73 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus rate533 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data86 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range0.95V-1.3Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 530 and Xeon Silver 4314 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketPBGA479,PPGA478FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt135 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 530 and Xeon Silver 4314. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron M 530 and Xeon Silver 4314 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 530 and Xeon Silver 4314 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 530 and Xeon Silver 4314. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-2667
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 530 and Xeon Silver 4314.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron M 530 302
Xeon Silver 4314 28954
+9487%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 16
Threads 1 32
Chip lithography 65 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 135 Watt

Celeron M 530 has 350% lower power consumption.

Xeon Silver 4314, on the other hand, has 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 550% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 530 and Xeon Silver 4314. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron M 530 is a notebook processor while Xeon Silver 4314 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 530 and Xeon Silver 4314, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 530
Celeron M 530
Intel Xeon Silver 4314
Xeon Silver 4314

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 34 votes

Rate Celeron M 530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 54 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4314 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 530 or Xeon Silver 4314, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.