Celeron 2.8 GHz vs M 520

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 520 and Celeron 2.8 GHz processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	not rated	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Celeron M	no data
Architecture codename	Merom (2006−2008)	Northwood (2001−2004)
Release date	no data	no data
Current price	$140	$41

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 520 and Celeron 2.8 GHz basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	1 (Single-Core)	1 (Single-Core)
Threads	1	1
Base clock speed	1.6 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1.6 GHz	2.8 GHz
Bus support	533 MHz	400 MHz
L3 cache	1 MB L2 Cache	no data
Chip lithography	65 nm	130 nm
Maximum core temperature	100 °C	no data
64 bit support	+	-
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	No	No
VID voltage range	0.95V-1.3V	no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 520 and Celeron 2.8 GHz compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socket	PPGA478	no data
Power consumption (TDP)	30 Watt	52.8 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 520 and Celeron 2.8 GHz. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	-	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
Idle States	-	no data
Demand Based Switching	-	no data
FSB parity	-	no data
Status	Discontinued	no data

Security technologies

Celeron M 520 and Celeron 2.8 GHz technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	no data
EDB	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 520 and Celeron 2.8 GHz are enumerated here.

VT-x

-

no data

Pros & cons summary

---

Chip lithography	65 nm	130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	30 Watt	52 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 520 and Celeron 2.8 GHz, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---