i9-13900HK vs Celeron M 430

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 430 and Core i9-13900HK processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated281
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCeleron MAlder Lake-P
Power efficiencyno data41.75
Architecture codenameYonah (2005−2006)Raptor Lake-H (2023)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$697

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 430 and Core i9-13900HK basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads120
Base clock speed1.73 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.73 GHz5.4 GHz
Bus rate533 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data80K (per core)
L2 cacheno data2 MB (per core)
L3 cache1 MB L2 KB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data257 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage range1.0V-1.3Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 430 and Core i9-13900HK compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPPGA478FCBGA1744
Power consumption (TDP)27 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 430 and Core i9-13900HK. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States-no data
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
FSB parity-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron M 430 and Core i9-13900HK technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 430 and Core i9-13900HK are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 430 and Core i9-13900HK. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267
Maximum memory sizeno data96 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® Iris® Xe Graphics eligible
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.5 GHz
Execution Unitsno data96

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron M 430 and Core i9-13900HK integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron M 430 and Core i9-13900HK integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096 x 2304 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron M 430 and Core i9-13900HK integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.1
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 430 and Core i9-13900HK.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron M 430 169
i9-13900HK 31536
+18560%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 14
Threads 1 20
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 45 Watt

Celeron M 430 has 66.7% lower power consumption.

i9-13900HK, on the other hand, has 1300% more physical cores and 1900% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 430 and Core i9-13900HK. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 430 and Core i9-13900HK, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 430
Celeron M 430
Intel Core i9-13900HK
Core i9-13900HK

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 25 votes

Rate Celeron M 430 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 61 vote

Rate Core i9-13900HK on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 430 or Core i9-13900HK, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.