Ryzen Embedded 8845HS vs Celeron M 410

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 410 and Ryzen Embedded 8845HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesCeleron Mno data
Architecture codenameYonah (2005−2006)Hawk Point (2024)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)2 April 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 410 and Ryzen Embedded 8845HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads116
Base clock speed1.46 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed1.46 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rate533 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cache1 MB L2 KB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data178 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data25,000 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range1.0V-1.3Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 410 and Ryzen Embedded 8845HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPPGA478FP8
Power consumption (TDP)27 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 410 and Ryzen Embedded 8845HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron M 410 and Ryzen Embedded 8845HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 410 and Ryzen Embedded 8845HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 410 and Ryzen Embedded 8845HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 780M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 410 and Ryzen Embedded 8845HS.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 8
Threads 1 16
Chip lithography 65 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 45 Watt

Celeron M 410 has 66.7% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Embedded 8845HS, on the other hand, has 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 1525% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 410 and Ryzen Embedded 8845HS. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron M 410 is a notebook processor while Ryzen Embedded 8845HS is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 410 and Ryzen Embedded 8845HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 410
Celeron M 410
AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS
Ryzen Embedded 8845HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron M 410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Ryzen Embedded 8845HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 410 or Ryzen Embedded 8845HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.