Celeron 2.60 vs Mobile Sempron 2700+
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 3671 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Mobile Sempron | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 0.12 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Georgetown | Northwood (2002−2004) |
| Release date | no data | June 2003 (22 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Mobile Sempron 2700+ and Celeron 2.60 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 8 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 128 KB |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | no data | 130 nm |
| Die size | no data | 146 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 55 million |
| 64 bit support | - | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Mobile Sempron 2700+ and Celeron 2.60 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | 478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 128 KB | 73 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Sempron 2700+ and Celeron 2.60. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR1, DDR2 |
Pros & cons summary
| Power consumption (TDP) | 128 Watt | 73 Watt |
Celeron 2.60 has 75.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Mobile Sempron 2700+ and Intel Celeron 2.60. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Mobile Sempron 2700+ is a notebook processor while Celeron 2.60 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
