i5-1145G7 vs Celeron M 410

Place in the ranking	3402	1091
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Celeron M	Intel Tiger Lake
Power efficiency	0.28	20.85
Architecture codename	Yonah (2005−2006)	Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021)
Release date	no data	2 September 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 410 and Core i5-1145G7 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	1 (Single-Core)	4 (Quad-Core)
Threads	1	8
Base clock speed	1.46 GHz	2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed	1.46 GHz	4.4 GHz
Bus rate	533 MHz	4 GT/s
L1 cache	no data	96K (per core)
L2 cache	no data	1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache	1 MB L2 KB	8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	65 nm	10 nm SuperFin
Maximum core temperature	100 °C	100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	no data	72 °C
64 bit support	-	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	+
VID voltage range	1.0V-1.3V	no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 410 and Core i5-1145G7 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	no data	1
Socket	PPGA478	FCBGA1449
Power consumption (TDP)	27 Watt	28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 410 and Core i5-1145G7. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI	-	+
FMA	-	+
AVX	-	+
vPro	no data	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	-	+
Speed Shift	no data	+
Turbo Boost Technology	-	2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	+
TSX	-	+
Idle States	-	+
Thermal Monitoring	-	+
SIPP	-	+
Demand Based Switching	-	no data
PAE	32 Bit	no data
FSB parity	-	no data
Deep Learning Boost	-	+

Security technologies

Celeron M 410 and Core i5-1145G7 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	+
EDB	+	no data
SGX	no data	-
OS Guard	no data	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 410 and Core i5-1145G7 are enumerated here.

VT-d	no data	+
VT-x	-	+
EPT	no data	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 410 and Core i5-1145G7. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	no data	DDR4
Maximum memory size	no data	64 GB
Max memory channels	no data	2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	no data	Intel® Iris® Xe Graphics
Quick Sync Video	-	+
Clear Video HD	no data	+
Graphics max frequency	no data	1.3 GHz
Execution Units	no data	80

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron M 410 and Core i5-1145G7 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported

no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron M 410 and Core i5-1145G7 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4	no data	4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over eDP	no data	4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort	no data	7680x4320@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron M 410 and Core i5-1145G7 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX	no data	12.1
OpenGL	no data	4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 410 and Core i5-1145G7.

PCIe version	no data	4.0
PCI Express lanes	no data	16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron M 410 0.08

i5-1145G7 6.17
+7613%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron M 410 123

i5-1145G7 9804
+7871%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.08	6.17
Physical cores	1	4
Threads	1	8
Chip lithography	65 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	27 Watt	28 Watt

Celeron M 410 has 3.7% lower power consumption.

i5-1145G7, on the other hand, has a 7612.5% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 550% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i5-1145G7 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 410 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 410 and Core i5-1145G7, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.