Celeron M U3600 vs M 390

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3405not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCeleron MIntel Celeron M
Power efficiency0.82no data
DesignerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Arrandale (2010−2011)
Release dateno data18 December 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 390 and Celeron M U3600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speed1.7 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz1.2 GHz
Bus rate400 MHz2500 MHz
L2 cacheno data512 KB
L3 cache1 MB L2 KB2 MB
Chip lithography90 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data81+114 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data382+177 Million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.004V-1.292Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 390 and Celeron M U3600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPPGA478, H-PBGA479BGA1288
Power consumption (TDP)21 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 390 and Celeron M U3600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
Fast Memory Accessno data+
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron M 390 and Celeron M U3600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 390 and Celeron M U3600 are enumerated here.

VT-x-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 390 and Celeron M U3600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 90 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 21 Watt 18 Watt

Celeron M U3600 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 181.3% more advanced lithography process, and 16.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron M 390 and Intel Celeron M U3600. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 390
Celeron M 390
Intel Celeron M U3600
Celeron M U3600

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 7 votes

Rate Celeron M 390 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron M U3600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron M 390 and Celeron M U3600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.