Processor N100 vs Celeron M 380

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron M 380
1 core / 1 thread, 21 Watt
0.17
Processor N100
2023
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
2.43
+1329%

Processor N100 outperforms Celeron M 380 by a whopping 1329% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 380 and Processor N100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32841776
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCeleron MIntel Alder Lake-N
Power efficiency0.7738.33
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Alder Lake-N (2023)
Release dateno data3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$128

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 380 and Processor N100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads14
Base clock speed1.6 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus rate400 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data96 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data2 MB (shared)
L3 cache1 MB L2 KB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range1.004V-1.292Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 380 and Processor N100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPPGA478, H-PBGA479Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)21 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 380 and Processor N100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron M 380 and Processor N100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 380 and Processor N100 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 380 and Processor N100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4, DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) ( - 750 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 380 and Processor N100.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron M 380 0.17
Processor N100 2.43
+1329%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Celeron M 380 111
Processor N100 16.22
+584%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.17 2.43
Physical cores 1 4
Threads 1 4
Chip lithography 90 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 21 Watt 6 Watt

Processor N100 has a 1329.4% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 800% more advanced lithography process, and 250% lower power consumption.

The Processor N100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 380 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 380 and Processor N100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 380
Celeron M 380
Intel Processor N100
Processor N100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 9 votes

Rate Celeron M 380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 1325 votes

Rate Processor N100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 380 or Processor N100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.