Turion 64 X2 TL-68 vs Celeron M 370

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 370 and Turion 64 X2 TL-68 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCeleron M2x AMD Turion 64
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Tyler (2007−2009)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)1 January 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 370 and Turion 64 X2 TL-68 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speed1.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus rate400 MHz800 MHz
L2 cacheno data1 MB
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography90 nm65 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.004V-1.292Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 370 and Turion 64 X2 TL-68 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketH-PBGA478,H-PBGA479,PPGA478no data
Power consumption (TDP)21 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 370 and Turion 64 X2 TL-68. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron M 370 and Turion 64 X2 TL-68 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 370 and Turion 64 X2 TL-68 are enumerated here.

VT-x-no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 90 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 21 Watt 35 Watt

Celeron M 370 has 66.7% lower power consumption.

Turion 64 X2 TL-68, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 370 and Turion 64 X2 TL-68. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 370 and Turion 64 X2 TL-68, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 370
Celeron M 370
AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-68
Turion 64 X2 TL-68

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 7 votes

Rate Celeron M 370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 41 vote

Rate Turion 64 X2 TL-68 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 370 or Turion 64 X2 TL-68, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.