Atom E3805 vs Celeron M 360

Place in the ranking	3339	3163
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Celeron M	Atom
Power efficiency	0.64	7.94
Architecture codename	Dothan (2004−2005)	Bay Trail
Release date	no data	no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 360 and Atom E3805 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	1 (Single-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	1	2
Base clock speed	1.4 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1.4 GHz	1.33 GHz
Bus rate	400 MHz	no data
L3 cache	1 MB L2 KB	no data
Chip lithography	90 nm	22 nm
Maximum core temperature	100 °C	no data
64 bit support	-	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
VID voltage range	1.26V, 1.004V-1.292V	no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 360 and Atom E3805 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socket	PPGA478, H-PBGA479	no data
Power consumption (TDP)	21 Watt	3 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 360 and Atom E3805. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	-	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
Idle States	-	no data
Demand Based Switching	-	no data
PAE	32 Bit	no data
FSB parity	-	no data

Security technologies

Celeron M 360 and Atom E3805 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	no data
EDB	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 360 and Atom E3805 are enumerated here.

VT-x

no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron M 360 0.14

Atom E3805 0.25
+78.6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron M 360 221

Atom E3805 406
+83.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.14	0.25
Physical cores	1	2
Threads	1	2
Chip lithography	90 nm	22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	21 Watt	3 Watt

Atom E3805 has a 78.6% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 309.1% more advanced lithography process, and 600% lower power consumption.

The Atom E3805 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 360 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 360 and Atom E3805, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.