Celeron M 360 vs V-Series V105

VS

Aggregate performance score

V-Series V105
2010
1 core / 1 thread, 9 Watt
0.14
Celeron M 360
1 core / 1 thread, 21 Watt
0.14

Primary details

Comparing V-Series V105 and Celeron M 360 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking33383335
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD V-SeriesCeleron M
Power efficiency1.470.63
Architecture codenameno dataDothan (2004−2005)
Release date12 May 2010 (14 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

V-Series V105 and Celeron M 360 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Base clock speedno data1.4 GHz
Boost clock speed1.2 GHz1.4 GHz
Bus rate2000 MHz400 MHz
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KBno data
L3 cacheno data1 MB L2 KB
Chip lithography45 nm90 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.26V, 1.004V-1.292V

Compatibility

Information on V-Series V105 and Celeron M 360 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketS1PPGA478, H-PBGA479
Power consumption (TDP)9 Watt21 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by V-Series V105 and Celeron M 360. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualizationno data
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

V-Series V105 and Celeron M 360 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by V-Series V105 and Celeron M 360 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by V-Series V105 and Celeron M 360. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

V-Series V105 0.14
Celeron M 360 0.14

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

V-Series V105 128
+2.3%
Celeron M 360 131

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 45 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 9 Watt 21 Watt

V-Series V105 has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between V-Series V105 and Celeron M 360.


Should you still have questions on choice between V-Series V105 and Celeron M 360, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD V-Series V105
V-Series V105
Intel Celeron M 360
Celeron M 360

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 11 votes

Rate V-Series V105 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 12 votes

Rate Celeron M 360 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about V-Series V105 or Celeron M 360, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.