Phenom II X3 P860 vs Celeron M 353
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Celeron M | 3x AMD Phenom II |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Dothan (2004−2005) | Champlain (2010−2011) |
| Release date | no data | 4 October 2010 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 353 and Phenom II X3 P860 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 3 (Tri-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 3 |
| Boost clock speed | 0.9 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 400 MHz | 3600 MHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 384 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 1.5 MB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 45 nm |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 353 and Phenom II X3 P860 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | no data | S1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 512 KB | 1.5 MB |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 353 and Phenom II X3 P860. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Virtualization, AMD64, Advanced Virus Protection, SSE(1,2,3,4a) |
| VirusProtect | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 353 and Phenom II X3 P860 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 353 and Phenom II X3 P860. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 3 |
| Threads | 1 | 3 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 512 Watt | 1 Watt |
Phenom II X3 P860 has 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 51100% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron M 353 and AMD Phenom II X3 P860. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
