Ultra 7 266V vs Celeron M 340

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 340 and Core Ultra 7 266V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3330not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCeleron Mno data
Power efficiency0.63no data
Architecture codenameBanias (2003)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release dateno data24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 340 and Core Ultra 7 266V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads18
Base clock speed1.5 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz5 GHz
Bus rate400 MHz37 MHz
L1 cacheno data192 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache512 KB L212 MB (shared)
Chip lithography130 nm3 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range1.356Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 340 and Core Ultra 7 266V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPPGA478FCBGA2833
Power consumption (TDP)24.5 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 340 and Core Ultra 7 266V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology--
TSX-+
Idle States-no data
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
FSB parity-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN

Security technologies

Celeron M 340 and Core Ultra 7 266V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB-+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 340 and Core Ultra 7 266V are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 340 and Core Ultra 7 266V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel Arc Graphics 140V
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data2 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron M 340 and Core Ultra 7 266V integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron M 340 and Core Ultra 7 266V integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDPno data3840x2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron M 340 and Core Ultra 7 266V integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.2
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 340 and Core Ultra 7 266V.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data4
PCI supportno data5.0 and 4.0

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 8
Threads 1 8
Chip lithography 130 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 24 Watt 17 Watt

Ultra 7 266V has 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 4233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 41.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 340 and Core Ultra 7 266V. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 340 and Core Ultra 7 266V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 340
Celeron M 340
Intel Core Ultra 7 266V
Core Ultra 7 266V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 3 votes

Rate Celeron M 340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core Ultra 7 266V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 340 or Core Ultra 7 266V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.