Ultra 5 236V vs Celeron M 340

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron M 340
1 core / 1 thread, 24 Watt
0.14
Core Ultra 5 236V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 17 Watt
13.49
+9536%

Core Ultra 5 236V outperforms Celeron M 340 by a whopping 9536% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 340 and Core Ultra 5 236V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3330557
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCeleron Mno data
Power efficiency0.6375.10
Architecture codenameBanias (2003)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release dateno data24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 340 and Core Ultra 5 236V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads18
Base clock speed1.5 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz4.7 GHz
Bus rate400 MHz37 MHz
L1 cacheno data192 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache512 KB L28 MB (shared)
Chip lithography130 nm3 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range1.356Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 340 and Core Ultra 5 236V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPPGA478Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)24.5 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 340 and Core Ultra 5 236V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX-+
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron M 340 and Core Ultra 5 236V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 340 and Core Ultra 5 236V are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 340 and Core Ultra 5 236V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataArc 130V

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 340 and Core Ultra 5 236V.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.14 13.49
Physical cores 1 8
Threads 1 8
Chip lithography 130 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 24 Watt 17 Watt

Ultra 5 236V has a 9535.7% higher aggregate performance score, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 4233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 41.2% lower power consumption.

The Core Ultra 5 236V is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 340 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 340 and Core Ultra 5 236V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 340
Celeron M 340
Intel Core Ultra 5 236V
Core Ultra 5 236V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 3 votes

Rate Celeron M 340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Core Ultra 5 236V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 340 or Core Ultra 5 236V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.