Celeron N2940 vs M 330
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 330 and Celeron N2940 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 2737 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Celeron M | Intel Celeron |
| Power efficiency | no data | 8.86 |
| Architecture codename | Banias (2003) | Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) |
| Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | 22 May 2014 (10 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 330 and Celeron N2940 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 1.4 GHz | 1.83 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.4 GHz | 2.25 GHz |
| Bus rate | 400 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 56K (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 512 KB L2 | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 22 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 1.356V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 330 and Celeron N2940 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | PPGA478 | FCBGA1170 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 24.5 Watt | 7.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 330 and Celeron N2940. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | - |
| Idle States | - | + |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
| Smart Connect | no data | + |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron M 330 and Celeron N2940 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | - | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| Anti-Theft | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 330 and Celeron N2940 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | - |
| VT-x | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 330 and Celeron N2940. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 8 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 21.32 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series |
| Quick Sync Video | - | + |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 854 MHz |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron M 330 and Celeron N2940 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 2 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 330 and Celeron N2940.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 4 |
| USB revision | no data | 3.0 and 2.0 |
| Total number of SATA ports | no data | 2 |
| Number of USB ports | no data | 5 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 24 Watt | 7 Watt |
Celeron N2940 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 490.9% more advanced lithography process, and 242.9% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron M 330 and Celeron N2940. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 330 and Celeron N2940, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
