Athlon Neo MV-40 vs Celeron M 320

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated3499
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCeleron MAMD Athlon Neo
Power efficiencyno data0.45
DesignerIntelAMD
Architecture codenameBanias (2003)Huron (2009)
Release dateno data6 January 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 320 and Athlon Neo MV-40 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Base clock speed1.3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.3 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rate400 MHz1600 MHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cacheno data512 KB
L3 cache512 KB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography130 nm65 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C95 °C
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.356Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 320 and Athlon Neo MV-40 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketH-PBGA478,H-PBGA479,PPGA478ASB1
Power consumption (TDP)24.5 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 320 and Athlon Neo MV-40. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization
VirusProtect-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron M 320 and Athlon Neo MV-40 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 320 and Athlon Neo MV-40 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 130 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 24 Watt 15 Watt

Athlon Neo MV-40 has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 60% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron M 320 and AMD Athlon Neo MV-40. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 320
Celeron M 320
AMD Athlon Neo MV-40
Athlon Neo MV-40

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Celeron M 320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 11 votes

Rate Athlon Neo MV-40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron M 320 and Athlon Neo MV-40, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.