Celeron M 333 vs Athlon Neo MV-40
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3499 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Athlon Neo | Celeron M |
| Power efficiency | 0.45 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Huron (2009) | Banias (2003) |
| Release date | 6 January 2009 (16 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
Athlon Neo MV-40 and Celeron M 333 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 0.9 GHz |
| Bus rate | 1600 MHz | 400 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 130 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon Neo MV-40 and Celeron M 333 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | ASB1 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon Neo MV-40 and Celeron M 333. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization | no data |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon Neo MV-40 and Celeron M 333 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 5 Watt |
Athlon Neo MV-40 has a 100% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron M 333, on the other hand, has 200% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Athlon Neo MV-40 and Intel Celeron M 333. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
