Xeon w9-3575X vs Celeron J4105

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J4105
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
1.83
Xeon w9-3575X
2024
44 cores / 88 threads, 340 Watt
52.02
+2743%

Xeon w9-3575X outperforms Celeron J4105 by a whopping 2743% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J4105 and Xeon w9-3575X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking199430
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.0534.04
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency17.3214.48
Architecture codenameGoldmont Plus (2017)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date11 December 2017 (6 years ago)24 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$3,789

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon w9-3575X has 1560% better value for money than Celeron J4105.

Detailed specifications

Celeron J4105 and Xeon w9-3575X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)44
Threads488
Base clock speed1.5 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz4.8 GHz
Multiplier15no data
L1 cache56 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB (shared)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB97.5 MB
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size93 mm24x 477 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data79 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J4105 and Xeon w9-3575X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1090FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt340 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4105 and Xeon w9-3575X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift-+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron J4105 and Xeon w9-3575X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® ME-
OS Guard++
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4105 and Xeon w9-3575X are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4105 and Xeon w9-3575X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size8 GB4 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 600N/A
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency750 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J4105 and Xeon w9-3575X integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J4105 and Xeon w9-3575X integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J4105 and Xeon w9-3575X integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4105 and Xeon w9-3575X.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes6112
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J4105 1.83
Xeon w9-3575X 52.02
+2743%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J4105 2905
Xeon w9-3575X 82624
+2744%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.83 52.02
Recency 11 December 2017 24 August 2024
Physical cores 4 44
Threads 4 88
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 340 Watt

Celeron J4105 has 3300% lower power consumption.

Xeon w9-3575X, on the other hand, has a 2742.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and 1000% more physical cores and 2100% more threads.

The Xeon w9-3575X is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J4105 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron J4105 is a desktop processor while Xeon w9-3575X is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4105 and Xeon w9-3575X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J4105
Celeron J4105
Intel Xeon w9-3575X
Xeon w9-3575X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 302 votes

Rate Celeron J4105 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon w9-3575X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J4105 or Xeon w9-3575X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.