Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U vs Celeron J4105

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J4105
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
1.83
Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
3.61
+97.3%

Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U outperforms Celeron J4105 by an impressive 97% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J4105 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19961497
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.12no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD Ryzen 3
Power efficiency17.3222.78
Architecture codenameGoldmont Plus (2017)Raven Ridge (2017−2018)
Release date11 December 2017 (6 years ago)26 October 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J4105 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.5 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz3.4 GHz
Multiplier1520
L1 cache56 KB (per core)128K (per core)
L2 cache4 MB (shared)512K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size93 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4950 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J4105 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1090FP5
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4105 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron J4105 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4105 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4105 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size8 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 600AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency750 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J4105 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J4105 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J4105 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4105 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes612
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J4105 1.83
Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U 3.61
+97.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J4105 2905
Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U 5742
+97.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.83 3.61
Integrated graphics card 0.87 3.04
Recency 11 December 2017 26 October 2017
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 15 Watt

Celeron J4105 has an age advantage of 1 month, and 50% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U, on the other hand, has a 97.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 249.4% faster integrated GPU.

The Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J4105 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron J4105 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4105 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J4105
Celeron J4105
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U
Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 303 votes

Rate Celeron J4105 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 120 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J4105 or Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.