Phenom II X4 805 vs Celeron J4025

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J4025 and Phenom II X4 805 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	2527	2321
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.67	0.10
Market segment	Desktop processor	Desktop processor
Power efficiency	8.80	1.23
Architecture codename	Gemini Lake Refresh (2019)	Deneb (2009−2011)
Release date	4 November 2019 (5 years ago)	9 February 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$107	$174

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron J4025 has 2570% better value for money than Phenom II X4 805.

Detailed specifications

Celeron J4025 and Phenom II X4 805 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	4 (Quad-Core)
Threads	2	4
Base clock speed	2 GHz	2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.9 GHz	2.5 GHz
L1 cache	56 KB (per core)	128 KB (per core)
L2 cache	4 MB (shared)	512 KB (per core)
L3 cache	no data	4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	14 nm	45 nm
Die size	93 mm2	258 mm2
Maximum core temperature	105 °C	no data
Number of transistors	no data	758 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	+	-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J4025 and Phenom II X4 805 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	Intel BGA 1090	AM3
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4025 and Phenom II X4 805. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	+	-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4025 and Phenom II X4 805 are enumerated here.

AMD-V	-	+
VT-d	+	no data
VT-x	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4025 and Phenom II X4 805. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR4

DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

Intel UHD Graphics 600 (250 - 700 MHz)

On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4025 and Phenom II X4 805.

PCIe version	2.0	2.0
PCI Express lanes	6	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	0.93	1.23
Recency	4 November 2019	9 February 2009
Physical cores	2	4
Threads	2	4
Chip lithography	14 nm	45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	95 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4025 and Phenom II X4 805, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---