EPYC Embedded 8534P vs Celeron J4025

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J4025 and EPYC Embedded 8534P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2527not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.67no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency8.80no data
Architecture codenameGemini Lake Refresh (2019)Siena (2023−2024)
Release date4 November 2019 (5 years ago)1 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J4025 and EPYC Embedded 8534P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads2128
Base clock speed2 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz3.1 GHz
L1 cache56 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB (shared)1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Die size93 mm24x 73 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data75 °C
Number of transistorsno data35,500 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J4025 and EPYC Embedded 8534P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketIntel BGA 1090SP6
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4025 and EPYC Embedded 8534P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4025 and EPYC Embedded 8534P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4025 and EPYC Embedded 8534P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 600 (250 - 700 MHz)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4025 and EPYC Embedded 8534P.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes696

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 November 2019 1 October 2024
Physical cores 2 64
Threads 2 128
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 200 Watt

Celeron J4025 has 1900% lower power consumption.

EPYC Embedded 8534P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, 3100% more physical cores and 6300% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron J4025 and EPYC Embedded 8534P. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron J4025 is a desktop processor while EPYC Embedded 8534P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4025 and EPYC Embedded 8534P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J4025
Celeron J4025
AMD EPYC Embedded 8534P
EPYC Embedded 8534P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 129 votes

Rate Celeron J4025 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC Embedded 8534P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J4025 or EPYC Embedded 8534P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.