Celeron N2840 vs J3455

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J3455
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
1.42
+284%
Celeron N2840
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 7 Watt
0.37

Celeron J3455 outperforms Celeron N2840 by a whopping 284% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J3455 and Celeron N2840 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22053041
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.22no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
Power efficiency13.455.01
Architecture codenameApollo Lake (2014−2016)Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release date30 August 2016 (8 years ago)22 May 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J3455 and Celeron N2840 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.5 GHz2.16 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz2.58 GHz
Multiplier15no data
L1 cacheno data56K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J3455 and Celeron N2840 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1296FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt7.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J3455 and Celeron N2840. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-+
HD Audio+no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron J3455 and Celeron N2840 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key++
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard-no data
Anti-Theft--

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J3455 and Celeron N2840 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
VT-i-no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J3455 and Celeron N2840. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/sDDR3
Maximum memory size8 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21.32 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 500Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency750 MHz792 MHz
Execution Units12no data
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J3455 and Celeron N2840 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J3455 and Celeron N2840 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+no data
OpenGL+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J3455 and Celeron N2840.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes64
USB revision2.0/3.03.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA ports22
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports85
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J3455 1.42
+284%
Celeron N2840 0.37

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J3455 2256
+284%
Celeron N2840 588

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron J3455 256
+43.8%
Celeron N2840 178

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron J3455 768
+159%
Celeron N2840 297

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.42 0.37
Recency 30 August 2016 22 May 2014
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 7 Watt

Celeron J3455 has a 283.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron N2840, on the other hand, has 42.9% lower power consumption.

The Celeron J3455 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N2840 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron J3455 is a desktop processor while Celeron N2840 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J3455 and Celeron N2840, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J3455
Celeron J3455
Intel Celeron N2840
Celeron N2840

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 228 votes

Rate Celeron J3455 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 660 votes

Rate Celeron N2840 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J3455 or Celeron N2840, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.