Ryzen 3 7320U vs Celeron J3355

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J3355
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.77
Ryzen 3 7320U
2022
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
5.82
+656%

Ryzen 3 7320U outperforms Celeron J3355 by a whopping 656% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J3355 and Ryzen 3 7320U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking25301049
Place by popularitynot in top-10091
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronMendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020)
Architecture codenameApollo Lake (2016)Mendocino-U (Zen 2)
Release date1 September 2016 (7 years ago)20 September 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data
Current price$55 (0.5x MSRP)no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J3355 and Ryzen 3 7320U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed2 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz4.1 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm6 nm
Die sizeno data100 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J3355 and Ryzen 3 7320U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1296FP6
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J3355 and Ryzen 3 7320U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataLPDDR5-5500 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI++
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
SIPP-no data
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-no data
StatusLaunchedno data
HD Audio+no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron J3355 and Ryzen 3 7320U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+no data
OS Guard-no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J3355 and Ryzen 3 7320U are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
VT-i-no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J3355 and Ryzen 3 7320U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 500AMD Radeon 610M
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency700 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J3355 and Ryzen 3 7320U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J3355 and Ryzen 3 7320U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+no data
OpenGL+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J3355 and Ryzen 3 7320U.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes64
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J3355 0.77
Ryzen 3 7320U 5.82
+656%

Ryzen 3 7320U outperforms Celeron J3355 by 656% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron J3355 1197
Ryzen 3 7320U 9003
+652%

Ryzen 3 7320U outperforms Celeron J3355 by 652% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron J3355 269
Ryzen 3 7320U 1169
+335%

Ryzen 3 7320U outperforms Celeron J3355 by 335% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron J3355 427
Ryzen 3 7320U 3661
+757%

Ryzen 3 7320U outperforms Celeron J3355 by 757% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.77 5.82
Integrated graphics card 0.75 2.86
Recency 1 September 2016 20 September 2022
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 15 Watt

The Ryzen 3 7320U is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J3355 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J3355 and Ryzen 3 7320U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J3355
Celeron J3355
AMD Ryzen 3 7320U
Ryzen 3 7320U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 51 vote

Rate Celeron J3355 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 511 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 7320U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J3355 or Ryzen 3 7320U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.