Opteron 842 vs Celeron J3355
Primary details
Comparing Celeron J3355 and Opteron 842 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2647 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.02 | no data |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
Series | Intel Celeron | no data |
Power efficiency | 7.10 | no data |
Architecture codename | Apollo Lake (2014−2016) | SledgeHammer (2003−2005) |
Release date | 30 August 2016 (8 years ago) | June 2003 (21 year ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Celeron J3355 and Opteron 842 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 1 |
Base clock speed | 2 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
Multiplier | 20 | no data |
L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 130 nm |
Die size | no data | 193 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | no data | 106 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron J3355 and Opteron 842 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 8 |
Socket | FCBGA1296 | 940 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 85 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J3355 and Opteron 842. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Smart Response | - | no data |
GPIO | + | no data |
Smart Connect | - | no data |
HD Audio | + | no data |
RST | - | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron J3355 and Opteron 842 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Secure Boot | + | no data |
Secure Key | + | no data |
Identity Protection | + | - |
OS Guard | - | no data |
Anti-Theft | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J3355 and Opteron 842 are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
VT-i | - | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J3355 and Opteron 842. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3, DDR4 | no data |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 500 | no data |
Max video memory | 8 GB | no data |
Quick Sync Video | + | - |
Clear Video | + | no data |
Clear Video HD | + | no data |
Graphics max frequency | 700 MHz | no data |
Execution Units | 12 | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J3355 and Opteron 842 integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
eDP | + | no data |
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
MIPI-DSI | + | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Celeron J3355 and Opteron 842 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | + | no data |
OpenGL | + | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J3355 and Opteron 842.
PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 6 | no data |
USB revision | 2.0/3.0 | no data |
Total number of SATA ports | 2 | no data |
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 2 | no data |
Number of USB ports | 8 | no data |
Integrated LAN | - | no data |
UART | + | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
Threads | 2 | 1 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 130 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 85 Watt |
Celeron J3355 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 828.6% more advanced lithography process, and 750% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron J3355 and Opteron 842. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Celeron J3355 is a desktop processor while Opteron 842 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J3355 and Opteron 842, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.