Celeron N2920 vs J3160

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J3160
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
0.82
+34.4%

J3160 outperforms N2920 by a substantial 34% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J3160 and Celeron N2920 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking24962680
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.66no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameAirmont (2015−2016)Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release date15 January 2016 (8 years ago)1 December 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$107
Current price$23 (0.2x MSRP)$278 (2.6x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J3160 and Celeron N2920 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.6 GHz1.86 GHz
Boost clock speed2.24 GHz2 GHz
L1 cacheno data56K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Maximum core temperature90 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J3160 and Celeron N2920 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt7.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J3160 and Celeron N2920. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring+no data
SIPP-no data
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-+
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
HD Audio+no data
RST--

Security technologies

Celeron J3160 and Celeron N2920 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard-no data
Anti-Theft--

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J3160 and Celeron N2920 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x++
VT-i-no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J3160 and Celeron N2920. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1600DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency700 MHz844 MHz
Execution Units12no data
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J3160 and Celeron N2920 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J3160 and Celeron N2920 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+no data
OpenGL+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J3160 and Celeron N2920.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes44
USB revision2.0/3.03.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA ports52
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports55
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J3160 0.82
+34.4%
Celeron N2920 0.61

J3160 outperforms N2920 by 34% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron J3160 1266
+33.3%
Celeron N2920 950

J3160 outperforms N2920 by 33% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.82 0.61
Recency 15 January 2016 1 December 2013
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 7 Watt

The Celeron J3160 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N2920 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron J3160 is a desktop processor while Celeron N2920 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J3160 and Celeron N2920, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J3160
Celeron J3160
Intel Celeron N2920
Celeron N2920

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 52 votes

Rate Celeron J3160 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 32 votes

Rate Celeron N2920 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J3160 or Celeron N2920, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.