Celeron 900 vs J1900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J1900 and Celeron 900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2571not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Architecture codenameBay Trail-D (2013)no data
Release date1 November 2013 (10 years ago)1 January 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$82no data
Current price$163 (2x MSRP)$42

Detailed specifications

Celeron J1900 and Celeron 900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)no data
Threads4no data
Base clock speed2 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.42 GHzno data
L1 cache224 KBno data
L2 cache2 MBno data
L3 cache2 MB L2 Cache1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography22 nm45 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J1900 and Celeron 900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCBGA1170PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1900 and Celeron 900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
SIPP-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI-no data
StatusLaunchedDiscontinued
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron J1900 and Celeron 900 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDB++
Identity Protection-no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1900 and Celeron 900 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1900 and Celeron 900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Seriesno data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Graphics max frequency854 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1900 and Celeron 900 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1900 and Celeron 900.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes4no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron J1900 1150
+190%
Celeron 900 396

J1900 outperforms 900 by 190% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron J1900 173
Celeron 900 218
+26%

900 outperforms J1900 by 26% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron J1900 520
+129%
Celeron 900 227

J1900 outperforms 900 by 129% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 2013 1 January 2009
Chip lithography 22 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 35 Watt

We couldn't decide between Celeron J1900 and Celeron 900. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1900 and Celeron 900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J1900
Celeron J1900
Intel Celeron 900
Celeron 900

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 184 votes

Rate Celeron J1900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 49 votes

Rate Celeron 900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J1900 or Celeron 900, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.