Atom C3338 vs Celeron J1900

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J1900 and Atom C3338 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	2563	2628
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	0.08
Market segment	Laptop	Server
Series	Intel Celeron	Intel Atom
Architecture codename	Bay Trail-D (2013)	Goldmont (2016−2017)
Release date	1 November 2013 (10 years ago)	22 February 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$82	$27
Current price	$163 (2x MSRP)	$698 (25.9x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

Celeron J1900 and Atom C3338 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	4	2
Base clock speed	2 GHz	1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.42 GHz	2.2 GHz
L1 cache	224 KB	112 KB
L2 cache	2 MB	4 MB
L3 cache	2 MB L2 Cache	4 MB
Chip lithography	22 nm	14 nm
Maximum core temperature	105 °C	89 °C
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	No	No

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J1900 and Atom C3338 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	FCBGA1170	FCBGA1310
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	8.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1900 and Atom C3338. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	-	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
QuickAssist	no data	-
Turbo Boost Technology	-	2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	-
SIPP	-	no data
PAE	36 Bit	no data
FDI	-	no data
Status	Launched	Launched
RST	-	no data

Security technologies

Celeron J1900 and Atom C3338 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB	+	+
Secure Boot	no data	+
Secure Key	no data	+
Identity Protection	-	no data
SGX	no data	-
OS Guard	no data	+
Anti-Theft	-	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1900 and Atom C3338 are enumerated here.

VT-d	-	+
VT-x	+	+
EPT	no data	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1900 and Atom C3338. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR4: 1866
Maximum memory size	8 GB	128 GB
Max memory channels	2	1
Maximum memory bandwidth	no data	14.936 GB/s
ECC memory support	-	+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series	no data
Quick Sync Video	+	no data
Graphics max frequency	854 MHz	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1900 and Atom C3338 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported

2

no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1900 and Atom C3338.

PCIe version	2.0	3
PCI Express lanes	4	10
USB revision	no data	3
Total number of SATA ports	no data	10
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports	no data	10
Number of USB ports	no data	8
Integrated LAN	no data	4x2.5/1 GBE

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J1900 outperforms Atom C3338 by 12% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	0.74	0.66
Recency	1 November 2013	22 February 2017
Physical cores	4	2
Threads	4	2
Cost	$82	$27
Chip lithography	22 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	8 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1900 and Atom C3338, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---