Pentium Gold G7400T vs Celeron J1800
Aggregate performance score
Pentium Gold G7400T outperforms Celeron J1800 by a whopping 903% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron J1800 and Pentium Gold G7400T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 3035 | 1498 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
Series | Intel Celeron | no data |
Power efficiency | 3.41 | 9.76 |
Architecture codename | Bay Trail-D (2013) | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
Release date | 1 November 2013 (11 years ago) | 4 January 2022 (2 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $72 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron J1800 and Pentium Gold G7400T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 2 | 4 |
Base clock speed | 2.41 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.58 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
L1 cache | 112 KB | 80K (per core) |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1.25 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 1 MB L2 Cache | 6 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 22 nm | Intel 7 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | 100 °C |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron J1800 and Pentium Gold G7400T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FCBGA1170 | FCLGA1700 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1800 and Pentium Gold G7400T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
AES-NI | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Speed Shift | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | + |
TSX | - | + |
Idle States | no data | + |
Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
PAE | 36 Bit | no data |
FDI | - | no data |
RST | - | no data |
Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Celeron J1800 and Pentium Gold G7400T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
EDB | + | + |
Secure Key | no data | + |
OS Guard | no data | + |
Anti-Theft | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1800 and Pentium Gold G7400T are enumerated here.
VT-d | - | + |
VT-x | + | + |
EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1800 and Pentium Gold G7400T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB | 128 GB |
Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 76.8 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series | Intel UHD Graphics 710 |
Quick Sync Video | + | + |
Clear Video HD | no data | + |
Graphics max frequency | 792 MHz | 1.35 GHz |
Execution Units | no data | 16 |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1800 and Pentium Gold G7400T integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 2 | 4 |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J1800 and Pentium Gold G7400T integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | no data | 4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz |
Max resolution over eDP | no data | 5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz |
Max resolution over DisplayPort | no data | 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Celeron J1800 and Pentium Gold G7400T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | no data | 12 |
OpenGL | no data | 4.5 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1800 and Pentium Gold G7400T.
PCIe version | 2.0 | 5.0 and 4.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 4 | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.36 | 3.61 |
Recency | 1 November 2013 | 4 January 2022 |
Threads | 2 | 4 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 35 Watt |
Celeron J1800 has 250% lower power consumption.
Pentium Gold G7400T, on the other hand, has a 902.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and 100% more threads.
The Pentium Gold G7400T is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J1800 in performance tests.
Be aware that Celeron J1800 is a notebook processor while Pentium Gold G7400T is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1800 and Pentium Gold G7400T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.