A6-9500E vs Celeron J1800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J1800 and A6-9500E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated2291
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data7.95
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Architecture codenameBay Trail-D (2013)Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date1 November 2013 (10 years ago)27 July 2017 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$72no data
Current price$253 (3.5x MSRP)$32

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J1800 and A6-9500E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.41 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.58 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache112 KBno data
L2 cache1 MB1024 KB
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data246 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J1800 and A6-9500E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170AM4
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1800 and A6-9500E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMAno data+
AVXno data+
FRTCno data1
FreeSyncno data1
PowerTuneno data+
TrueAudiono data+
PowerNowno data+
PowerGatingno data+
VirusProtectno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
SIPP-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron J1800 and A6-9500E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Identity Protection-no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1800 and A6-9500E are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1800 and A6-9500E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels22
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 SeriesAMD Radeon R5 Graphics
iGPU core countno data4
Quick Sync Video+no data
Endurono data+
UVDno data+
VCEno data+
Graphics max frequency792 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1800 and A6-9500E integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
DisplayPortno data+
HDMIno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J1800 and A6-9500E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkanno data1

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1800 and A6-9500E.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes48

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron J1800 572
A6-9500E 1756
+207%

A6-9500E outperforms Celeron J1800 by 207% in Passmark.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 2013 27 July 2017
Chip lithography 22 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 35 Watt

We couldn't decide between Celeron J1800 and A6-9500E. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron J1800 is a notebook processor while A6-9500E is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1800 and A6-9500E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J1800
Celeron J1800
AMD A6-9500E
A6-9500E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 495 votes

Rate Celeron J1800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 40 votes

Rate A6-9500E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J1800 or A6-9500E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.