Celeron J1800 vs A8-9600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing A8-9600 and Celeron J1800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1765not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.13no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Bay Trail-D (2013)
Release date27 July 2017 (6 years ago)1 November 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$78$72
Current price$30 (0.4x MSRP)$253 (3.5x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A8-9600 and Celeron J1800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.1 GHz2.41 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz2.58 GHz
L1 cacheno data112 KB
L2 cache2048 KB1 MB
L3 cache0 KB1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography28 nm22 nm
Die size250 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors3,100 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A8-9600 and Celeron J1800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-9600 and Celeron J1800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+no data
AVX+no data
FRTC1no data
FreeSync1no data
PowerTune+no data
TrueAudio+no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
VirusProtect+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
SIPPno data-
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data-
Statusno dataDiscontinued
RSTno data-

Security technologies

A8-9600 and Celeron J1800 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Identity Protectionno data-
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-9600 and Celeron J1800 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-9600 and Celeron J1800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channels22
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 GraphicsIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
iGPU core count6no data
Quick Sync Videono data+
Enduro+no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data
Graphics max frequencyno data792 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A8-9600 and Celeron J1800 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A8-9600 and Celeron J1800 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-9600 and Celeron J1800.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes84

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A8-9600 3303
+477%
Celeron J1800 572

A8-9600 outperforms Celeron J1800 by 477% in Passmark.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 July 2017 1 November 2013
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Cost $78 $72
Chip lithography 28 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 10 Watt

We couldn't decide between A8-9600 and Celeron J1800. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that A8-9600 is a desktop processor while Celeron J1800 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-9600 and Celeron J1800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-9600
A8-9600
Intel Celeron J1800
Celeron J1800

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 911 votes

Rate A8-9600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 481 vote

Rate Celeron J1800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-9600 or Celeron J1800, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.