Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U vs Celeron J1750

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J1750 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated603
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Architecture codenameBay Trail-D (2013)Phoenix (Zen4)
Release date1 September 2013 (10 years ago)23 May 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$72no data
Current price$200 (2.8x MSRP)no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J1750 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speed2.41 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.41 GHz4.9 GHz
L1 cache112 KB384 KB
L2 cache1 MB6 MB
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache16 MB
Chip lithography22 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data178 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J1750 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCBGA1170no data
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1750 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
SIPP-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron J1750 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Identity Protection-no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1750 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1750 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 SeriesAMD Radeon 740M
Graphics max frequency750 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1750 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1750 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes4no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron J1750 595
Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U 18192
+2957%

Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U outperforms Celeron J1750 by 2957% in Passmark.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2013 23 May 2023
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 12
Chip lithography 22 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 15 Watt

We couldn't decide between Celeron J1750 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1750 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J1750
Celeron J1750
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U
Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 3 votes

Rate Celeron J1750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 10 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J1750 or Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.