Processor 300T vs Celeron J1750

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J1750 and Processor 300T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Architecture codenameBay Trail-D (2013)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$72no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J1750 and Processor 300T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.41 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.41 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache112 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data163 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J1750 and Processor 300T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1750 and Processor 300T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI-no data
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched
RST-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron J1750 and Processor 300T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1750 and Processor 300T are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1750 and Processor 300T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size8 GB192 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data76.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 SeriesIntel UHD Graphics 710
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequency750 MHz1.45 GHz
Execution Unitsno data16

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1750 and Processor 300T integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported24

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J1750 and Processor 300T integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J1750 and Processor 300T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1750 and Processor 300T.

PCIe version2.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes416

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2013 8 January 2024
Threads 2 4
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 35 Watt

Celeron J1750 has 250% lower power consumption.

Processor 300T, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, and 100% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Celeron J1750 and Processor 300T. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron J1750 is a notebook processor while Processor 300T is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1750 and Processor 300T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J1750
Celeron J1750
Intel Processor 300T
Processor 300T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 4 votes

Rate Celeron J1750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Processor 300T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J1750 or Processor 300T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.