Xeon E-2478 vs Celeron J1750

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J1750
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.37
Xeon E-2478
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 80 Watt
18.78
+4976%

Xeon E-2478 outperforms Celeron J1750 by a whopping 4976% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J1750 and Xeon E-2478 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3019313
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data82.67
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency3.5022.22
Architecture codenameBay Trail-D (2013)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$72$568

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J1750 and Xeon E-2478 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speed2.41 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.41 GHz5.2 GHz
Bus rateno data16 GT/s
L1 cache112 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data257 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J1750 and Xeon E-2478 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1750 and Xeon E-2478. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-2
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
PAE36 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
FDI-no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron J1750 and Xeon E-2478 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1750 and Xeon E-2478 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1750 and Xeon E-2478. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size8 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 SeriesN/A
Graphics max frequency750 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1750 and Xeon E-2478 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1750 and Xeon E-2478.

PCIe version2.05
PCI Express lanes416

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J1750 0.37
Xeon E-2478 18.78
+4976%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J1750 595
Xeon E-2478 29827
+4913%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.37 18.78
Recency 1 September 2013 14 December 2023
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 80 Watt

Celeron J1750 has 700% lower power consumption.

Xeon E-2478, on the other hand, has a 4975.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

The Xeon E-2478 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J1750 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron J1750 is a notebook processor while Xeon E-2478 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1750 and Xeon E-2478, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J1750
Celeron J1750
Intel Xeon E-2478
Xeon E-2478

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 4 votes

Rate Celeron J1750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon E-2478 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J1750 or Xeon E-2478, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.