Processor 300 vs Celeron J1750

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J1750 and Processor 300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Architecture codenameBay Trail-D (2013)Raptor Lake-S
Release date1 September 2013 (10 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$72no data
Current price$200 (2.8x MSRP)$36

Detailed specifications

Celeron J1750 and Processor 300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.41 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2.41 GHz3.9 GHz
L1 cache112 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm10 nm
Die sizeno data163 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J1750 and Processor 300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA11701700
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt46 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1750 and Processor 300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSXno data+
SIPP-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron J1750 and Processor 300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB+no data
Identity Protection-no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1750 and Processor 300 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1750 and Processor 300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 SeriesIntel UHD Graphics 710
Graphics max frequency750 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1750 and Processor 300 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1750 and Processor 300.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes416

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2013 8 January 2024
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 46 Watt

We couldn't decide between Celeron J1750 and Processor 300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron J1750 is a notebook processor while Processor 300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1750 and Processor 300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J1750
Celeron J1750
Intel Processor 300
Processor 300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 3 votes

Rate Celeron J1750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 13 votes

Rate Processor 300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J1750 or Processor 300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.